Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

from promising to remove withholdings to accusing them of valuing


A dizzying journey in just 50 days. The campaign promise of eliminating agricultural withholdings seems to have been very far away. The President not only wanted to raise export duties for the oil industry but also for regional economies. But that’s not all, in the last hours the Javier Milei directly accused sectors of the countryside of being “smugglers.”

Thus, the president seems to move further and further away from a key sector for the Argentine economy and which in practice is the main contributor of foreign currency. In relation to the elimination of the fiscal package of the so-called Omnibus Law, he denounced in a radio interview: “We have identified the suitcases and suitcases, those of tobacco, biodiesel, oil. Especially, an oil company.” Without hesitation he directly accused an agro-exporter of paying bribes in Congress but without giving.

Following these statements, industry sources consulted by Ámbito detailed: “We were very surprised. If the President makes complaints, he is obliged to present evidence in court. If he does not do it, it is clear that they are not real, as he has been doing with journalists, among others.

Meanwhile, the Government does not seem to acknowledge receipt of the presidential statements and the formal complaint against the alleged “vaculants” has not yet been brought to justice.

Representativeness of agriculture

In this context, The role of the current Secretary of Agriculture, Fernando Vilella, who was an advisor to Milei’s space when he was a candidate for president, seems to be difficult.. At that time, not so distant, the former professor and dean of the Faculty of Agronomy of the University of Buenos Aires announced that he had presented to the political space a plan for the gradual elimination of export duties for the main agricultural crops and that this It would take shape during the eventual presidency of the libertarian.

The truth is that with the arrival of Caputo to Economy that plan seems to have been shelved and on the contrary the fiscal goal of zero deficit “forced” the Government to increase the tax to the countryside and industry. Now, after the resistance of the Governors and not obtaining enough votes in Congress, the Government then backed down with the increase in withholdings, But almost simultaneously, Milei himself once again started a confrontation with the agro-exporters and other sectors of the countryside.

In general terms, the Secretary of Agriculture, as happened with previous governments, seems to have a place of little weight within the national cabinet and on the contrary, key decisions for the sector are made at the small table of the Ministry of Economy.

Javier Milei Rural Society.jpg

During the campaign Javier Milei promised that he would eliminate withholdings.

Photo: Télam Agency.

Tell me who governs and I will tell you how to protest

In a context that seems complex in Milei’s relationship with the countryside, the absence of some voices that are always critical of any government action against the interests of the countryside is particularly striking.

By case, The Corporate Liaison Table is conspicuous by its absence and the four entities, separately, came out to respond tepidly at the time to the eventual increase in withholdings. And they were barely “disappointed,” as they reported, at the continuity of a BCRA measure that makes credit more expensive for producers who keep more than 5% of soybeans.

Meanwhile, Milei advances with controversial statements and actions, very far from those campaign promises for the countryside.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *